	Shop

Philips SCP010 Indoor Passive UHF/VHF/FM/HDTV Antenna

Zoom

Philips SCP010 Indoor Passive UHF/VHF/FM/HDTV Antenna

(20 customer reviews)

SKU:

78455

Availability: Out of stock

Philips SCP010 indoor antenna is compatible with UHF, VHF, FM and HDTV. The UHF element has a 360 degrees turn radius and 180 degrees tilt radius giving you a wide range of reception. Antenna¿s VHF dipoles measure 32 inches. Antenna has compact design that folds into itself making it less invasive when not in use. Antenna comes with 75 ¿ 300 indoor transformer and attached six foot coaxial cable.

List Price:
You Save:

Out of stock

Product Details

Product Length:	8.5 inches
Product Width:	8.0 inches
Product Height:	3.25 inches
Product Weight:	0.95 pounds
Package Length:	8.2 inches
Package Width:	8.1 inches
Package Height:	3.2 inches
Package Weight:	0.95 pounds
Average Customer Rating:	based on 20 reviews

Features

Channels 2-13 and 14-69
32" VHF dipoles
UHF element with 360 degree turn radius and 180 degree tilt radius
Includes 75-300 ohm indoor transformer
Attached 6' coaxial cable

Customer Reviews

Average Customer Review: 3.0

( 20 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

15 of 15 found the following review helpful:

pretty good antenna among non-powered HDTV ones Aug 12, 2008 By Jae W. Hwang "Jaewoong"
I have tried many HDTV antennas including Terk HDTV indoor, RCA ANT1251 Indoor Antenna, RCA ANT537 Indoor amplified tv antenna, and this one. Basically, Terk and RCA 1251 were useless. It didn't matter whether those were amplified or not. Those two didn't capture more than 5 HDTV channels. RCA 537 model was pretty good. Actually, it captured 5-10 HDTV channels and more regular channels if you play well enough with rabbit ear things. However, it consumes power and I decided to try this Philips one. At first, I was disappointed since it got only 3 HDTV channels, but as I move the ring antenna and rabbit ear ones, I have successfully got more than 5 HDTV channels. It is still not as good as RCA 537 model but if you don't want to use electricity, I think this one will work as good as most of other amplified antennas. As you know, the picture quality of HDTV channels are amazing once you get the signal. Usually better than cable tv HDTV channels.

8 of 8 found the following review helpful:

Well built with one exception, but might not work for you Jun 09, 2009 By W. Galway
This simple passive (unamplified) antenna is solidly built. The base is weighted enough that it doesn't fall over easily, and the rabbit ears are stiff enough that you can spread them apart without their flopping over.

My one complaint is that the antenna uses a screw-on plug that's difficult to attach to the TV. When connecting it I wished I had three hands: one to hold the cable, one to steady the TV, and one to twist the threaded connector onto the TV. If they'd used a slip-on plug instead of a screw-on plug then two hands would have been enough. Also, I think the pin on the plug was misaligned, since it took several tries before I could get it to start screwing on.

My wife and I bought this antenna for a new flat-screen television, which is replacing a 10-year old tube television. The rabbit ears (and butterfly) antenna on the old TV worked fine with the inexpensive digital converter box that we'd purchased. (We'd meant to keep the old television for several more years, but then decided to go for a 1080p flat-screen.)

Since the old antenna worked, I thought this new antenna would work just as well, but I was wrong. That's not influencing my review because so many things can affect signal strength. After moving the new antenna around the house, I think the old antenna worked better because it was sitting ON TOP of the old television, while the new antenna is sitting a few feet lower, next to the new television. If I pick the new antenna up and lift it a few feet I get much better reception on the few channels that are troublesome.

Here are a few suggestions if you're considering this antenna:
Use an ".org" or ".gov" website that gives guidance on antennas. For the best results, give the site your exact street address, including how high your antenna will be above street level. You're not likely to have much luck with a cheap passive antenna unless the website suggests a small multidirectional antenna type for all the channels you're interested in. If you decide you want to aim your antenna then some websites let you print a map showing you the directions that your TV stations transmit from (although you might get a stronger reflected signal from a different direction).

If you buy the antenna and it "almost" works then you can try aiming it. The rabbit ears on the antenna pick up VHF channels. When the ears point straight up they pick up signals equally well from all directions. When they are spread apart in a "V" shape then your best reception will be directly in front of and directly behind the "V". Similarly, the "O" part of the antenna picks up UHF channels. When you look straight through the "O" then your best reception will be directly in front of you and directly behind you.

9 of 10 found the following review helpful:

good product Nov 10, 2006 By Russell Fox
This works better than other regular antennas I have tried and it is very well priced.

8 of 9 found the following review helpful:

Works Great with Digital to Analog Converters Jul 10, 2008 By Grad_Student
I recently bought a digital-to-analog converter for my TV and bought this as a cheap antennae to accompany it. A few years ago, I tried only having broadcast stations, but reluctantly bought cable because the reception was so bad with my amplified radioshack antennae. I definitely don't have that problem anymore. All of the major networks and PBS come in crystal clear. I wish I had spent the $10 on this four years ago instead of sinking all that money into cable.

5 of 5 found the following review helpful:

Does exactly what it's supposed to Nov 23, 2008 By L. Britton
I should preface this by saying that I live in SF, and Sutro Tower is all of a mile and a half away, so I probably could have gotten most channels with a coat hanger. That said, this antenna seems to be fairly solid in construction, and after just a quick scan I am getting not only the channels from Sutro Tower but also those from San Bruno Mountain - admittedly still less than 7 miles away. Overall I am receiving 15 analog and over 30 digital channels, most of which I do not want, but all of which have excellent signal strangth.

[...]

For people who did not bother checking to see what kind of antenna they needed before buying: Please stop giving poor reviews just because you can't get signals from 40 miles away with a passive antenna. This type of antenna is designed for those who live close to a tower. If you live in the boonies you're just going to have to spend a little more. It's not fair, but it's true, and it certainly isn't the device's fault.

See all 20 customer reviews on Amazon.com